It looks obvious

No apology for tyranny.
We decline to make excuses for, to indulgently "understand", reactionary regimes and movements for which democracy is a hated enemy — regimes that oppress their own peoples and movements that aspire to do so. We draw a firm line between ourselves and those left-liberal voices today quick to offer an apologetic explanation for such political forces.

Alas, the U.S. has no access to these riches, because the Clinton administration branded Sudan a “terrorist state” and imposed a blockade, as well as bombing its only major pharmaceutical plant in 1998. The China National Petroleum Corporation holds the only oil leases in Darfur. The U.S. wants that oil. And it wants a foothold in this region so well situated to exert military and political power over the Middle East.
That’s why the U.S. favors sending U.N. troops into Darfur — and why China and France, with already established oil claims, do not.

Last Sept. 17, a Global Day for Darfur, thousands demonstrated in New York. Their main call was not for aid , but for 20,000 U.N. troops. Most of them were concerned young students and anti-war activists, chanting “Out of Iraq, into Darfur.” They are unaware that the Save Darfur campaign is organized and financed primarily by the right wing — evangelical and Zionist groups and NGOs funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. Rally leaders met with George W. Bush in the White House just before the event.

Only through an exchange of material resources and technological skills between richer and poorer countries will regions like Darfur recover from their torment. But, under the system of production for profit, equitable exchange is excluded.
Here and now, support for Darfur must include demanding the end of sanctions against Sudan along with immediate humanitarian relief and development aid for projects like irrigation. Aid that comes from governments must be unconditional. And, if there is any possibility of forming committees of women, farmers, herders and workers to make decisions about aid distribution, this should be fought for.