Yes, she is a women regardless her political affiliation
Watching Sarah Palin’s interview made me wonder doubt how intelligent she is. I disagree with many statements that she made, and I think many of them were the results of extreme ignorance and very simplistic understanding of the world. If I was her opponent I would be glad to use a lot of what she said to discredit her as a serious candidate for the role of Vice President. Although, as a side note, one might argue that intelligence was not a qualifying litmus test for the role of VP before - nor for the President.
But when I read this criticism, arguing that Palin isn’t a women because she didn’t pass some ideological test is not only stupid but also offensive. Even when I was young I always consider those who dared other to prove their masculinity as stupid, I consider those who daring women, or any other groups, to abide by some strict ideological line to prove their physical being flat out stupid. But it is worse - those who appointed themselves to be the gender guardian - in the name of equality and rights - are too often the worse in breaking social barrier that should have never existed:
Her greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman. The Republican party’s cynical calculation that because she has a womb and makes lots and lots of babies (and drives them to school! wow!) she speaks for the women of America, and will capture their hearts and their votes, has driven thousands of real women to take to their computers in outrage. She does not speak for women; she has no sympathy for the problems of other women, particularly working class women.
Wouldn’t it be simply smarter to say that Palin is wrong on the women right to choose, she is wrong on foreign policy (or maybe wrong would be to generous in her case) and wrong on any other list of issues?
Tags: Feminism, Foreign Policy, Sarah Palin, The right to chooseRelated posts
Add New Comment
Viewing 27 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Did you need elaboration after watching the interview? It is obvious from the interview that she is either repeating the lines giver to her by her advisors without having any real knowledge or that she is simply quoting the hawkish line you can catch while watching faux (I didn't misspelled here :) ) news.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I very much doubt that!:) . However, I'll try to explain later this week my arguments about Palin's lack of substance about foreign affairs and National Security
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
If intelligence is not a qualifying litmus test for the role of VP, why bring it up with connection to this VP candidate?
Let me know when you had enough:-)
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
The post was mainly criticism the stupid argument that Palin isn't a women instead of valid criticism of her ignorance or intelligence. Specifically to your question - knowledge and intelligence are not qualifying factors, but I hope it was.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.